Ukrainian political show

What should have been done in the country so that the electorate believed the showman Zelensky more than the incumbent president?

Was it really worth enduring five years of bullying on the way to the European Union in order to choose a comedian, albeit very well ridiculing everything that happens in the political, economic and social life in Ukraine? Didn't the Ukrainian authorities themselves give a lot of reasons for this?

Isn't the incumbent president ashamed of the fact that he, who has been trying to lead the country into a bright European future for five years, was beaten by a showman, a boy from the stage who successfully felt the mood of the tired Ukrainian people?

Vladimir Zelensky has 30.24% of the votes, the current President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko - 15.95, Yulia Tymoshenko - 13.40, Boyko - 11.67, Gritsenko - 6.91, Smeshko - 6.04, Lyashko - 5.48 . The remaining 32 candidates scored less than five percent. Just imagine this ballot paper, it's not a ballot, it's a real euro size sheet. The length of the ballot turned out to be 80 centimeters.

Volodymyr Zelensky and incumbent head of state Petro Poroshenko advanced to the second round of elections. Ukrainians would not be hurt by the thoughtful expression of Dmitry Medvedev, which has become a catchphrase: “There is no money, but you hold on!”.

The show in Ukraine will continue on April 21.

Предлагаем посмотреть другие страницы сайта:
← The Myth of a Peaceful Poland | What the USSR gave to its Eastern partners →