Источник данных о погоде: Минск погода на 7 дней
Мы находимся:
Беларусь, Минск
Связь с редакцией. Email:
883388a@gmail.com
Беларусь, Минск
883388a@gmail.com
The Greek Catholic Orthodox /right-faithful/ church (now the Russian Orthodox Church) began to be called "Orthodox" only on September 8, 1943 (approved by Stalin's decree). What, then, was called Orthodoxy for several millennia?
“In our time, in modern Russian vernacular, in the official, scientific and religious designation, the term “Orthodoxy” is applied to anything related to the ethno-cultural tradition and it is necessarily associated with the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and the Judeo-Christian religion.
To a simple question: “What is Orthodoxy”, a modern person, without hesitation, will answer:
"Orthodoxy is the Christian faith that Kievan Rus adopted during the reign of Prince Vladimir from the Byzantine Empire in 988 AD. And that Orthodoxy, that is, the Christian faith, has existed on Russian soil for more than a thousand years."
Scientists from historical science and Christian theologians, in confirmation of their words, declare that the earliest use of the word Orthodoxy in the territory of Rus' is allegedly recorded in the “Sermon on Law and Grace” of 1037-1050 by Metropolitan Hilarion.
But was it really so?
If you carefully read the preamble to the federal law on freedom of conscience and religious associations, adopted on September 26, 1997. Note the following points in the preamble:
“Recognizing the special role of Orthodoxy in Russia…and further respecting Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and other religions…”
Thus, the concepts of Orthodoxy and Christianity (more precisely, Judeo-Christianity) are not identical and carry completely different concepts and meanings.
It is worth considering who participated in the seven councils of the Christian (Judeo-Christian) church? Orthodox holy fathers or still Orthodox holy fathers, as indicated in the original Word on Law and Grace? By whom and when was it decided to replace one concept with another? And was there ever any mention of Orthodoxy in the past?
The answer to this question was given by the Byzantine monk Belisarius in 532 AD. Long before the baptism of Rus', here is what he wrote in his Chronicles about the Slavs and their rite of visiting the bath:
“Orthodox Slovenes and Rusyns are wild people, and their life is wild and godless, men and girls lock themselves together in a hot, overheated hut and exhaust their bodies ...”
Let's not pay attention to the fact that for the monk Belisarius, the usual visit by the Slavs to the bath seemed something wild and incomprehensible, this is quite natural. For us, something else is important. Pay attention to how he called the Slavs: Orthodox Slovenes and Rusyns.
For this one phrase alone, we must express our gratitude to him. Since with this phrase the Byzantine monk Belisarius confirms that the Slavs were Orthodox for many hundreds (thousands) of years before their conversion to the Christian (Judeo-Christian) faith.
The Slavs were called Orthodox, because they praised the RIGHT.
Our ancestors believed that reality, the cosmos, is divided into three levels. And it is also very similar to the Indian system of division: Upper World, Middle World and Lower World.
In Rus', these three levels were called like this:
Judeo-Christianity is considered a monotheistic religion, but the one God is a combination of 3 Gods: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. In Jewish and Christian mythology, there are higher angels Seraphim and Cherubim. Dark forces in Judeo-Christianity are represented by devils, demons and the devil.
After the adoption of Judeo-Christianity, the functions of the Slavic Vedic Gods were artificially transferred to supposedly Judeo-Christian saints.
Thus, the Vedic Gods are present in Judeo-Christianity, but under the guise of the so-called. "saints": they are, as it were, disguised.
The same change happened with the holidays. Yeshua ha-Mashiyah (Jesus Christ), respectively, was allegedly attributed the birth on the day when the Solar Gods were born (the day the winter solstice ends - the birth of a new sun) - December 25th.
Yes, and they crucified him, allegedly, just on Easter (which the Jews already had). On this holiday, the Jews sacrificed people and cattle, just as Christ loved us and gave Himself up for us as an offering and sacrifice to God, for a pleasant fragrance. (Eph 5:1,2)
So this holiday initially does not mean at all what the ROC ascribes to it, as, in principle, to other “own” holidays.
In this regard, a logical question arises: does Judeo-Christianity have its own holidays at all?
Any Indian follower of Vedanta knows that his religion along with the Aryans came from Rus'. And the modern Russian language is their ancient Sanskrit. It's just that in India it changed to Hindi, but in Russia it remained the same. Therefore, Indian Vedism is not fully Russian Vedism.
The Russian nicknames for the gods Vyshen (Rod) and Kryshen (Yar) became the names of the Indian gods Vishnu and Krishnu. The encyclopedia is slyly silent about this ...
Witchcraft is the everyday understanding of Russian Vedism, including the elementary skills of magic and mysticism. "Fight against witches" in Western Europe in the XV-XVI centuries. was a struggle with the Slavs who prayed to the Vedic Gods.
After all, the concept of “Orthodoxy” originally belonged to Russian Vedism and meant: “They glorified the rule.”
Therefore, the original Judeo-Christianity began to call itself "orthodox", but this term then went to Islam. As you know, Christianity has the epithet "Orthodox" only in Russian; on the rest, it calls itself "orthodox", that is, precisely "orthodox".
In other words, the current Judeo-Christianity secretly appropriated the Vedic name "Orthodoxy", which is deeply rooted in the Russian consciousness, to mislead the Slavs.
The functions of Veles, to a much greater extent than St. Blaise, were inherited by St. Nicholas of Myra, nicknamed Nicholas the Wonderworker. (See the result of a study published in the book: Uspensky BA Philological research in the field of Slavic antiquities. - M .: MGU, 1982.)
By the way, many of his icons are inscribed in implicit letters: MARY LIK. Hence the original name of the area in honor of the face of Mary: Marlician. So in fact this bishop was Nicholas of Marlic. And his city, which was originally called "Mary" (that is, the city of Mary), is now called Bari. There was a phonetic change of sounds.
However, now the Judeo-Christians do not remember these details..., hushing up the Vedic roots of Judeo-Christianity. Yeshua ha-Mashiyah (Jesus Christ) in Judeo-Christianity is interpreted as the God of Israel, although Judaism does not consider him a god.
At one time, Vedism was very calm about Judeo-Christianity, seeing in it just a local Jewish religious growth, for which there is a name: paganism (that is, an ethnic variety), like Greek or Roman paganism.
And only over time, under the influence of political, or rather, geopolitical reasons, Judeo-Christianity was opposed to the Slavic-Aryan Vedism, and then Judeo-Christianity saw manifestations of “paganism” everywhere and waged a fight with it “not to the stomach, but to death" ...
Judeo-Christianity within the framework of ALL Rus' was adopted not in 988, but between 1630 and 1635.
The study of Christian icons made it possible to identify sacred texts on them. Explicit inscriptions cannot be attributed to their number. But they absolutely include implicit inscriptions associated with Russian Vedic Gods, temples and priests (mims).
On the old converted Christian icons of the Virgin and Child (the Jewish Mother of God with Yeshua /Jesus/) there are Russian inscriptions in runes, saying that these are the Slavic Goddess Makosh with the baby God Yar.
Also, some called Jesus Christ CHORUS OR MOUNTAINS. Moreover, the name CHORUS on the mosaic depicting Christ in the Church of Christ Hora in Istanbul is written like this: “NHOR”, that is, ICHORS. The letter I used to be written as N. The name IGOR is almost identical to the name IKHOR OR KHOR, since the sounds X and G could pass into each other. By the way, it is possible that the respectful name HERO also came from here, which later entered many languages practically unchanged.
And then the need to disguise the Vedic inscriptions becomes clear: their discovery on the icons could lead to the accusation of the icon painter of belonging to the Orthodox Old Believers, and for this, according to the reform of the Judeo-Christian Nikon, punishment in the form of exile or death could follow.
On the other hand, as it is now becoming obvious, the absence of Vedic inscriptions made the icon a non-sacred artifact (powerless). In other words, it was not so much the presence of narrow noses, thin lips and large eyes that made the image sacred, but just the connection with the god Yar in the first place and with the goddess Mara in the second place, through reference implicit inscriptions, added magic and miraculous properties to the icon. Therefore, icon painters, if they wanted to make the icon miraculous, and not a simple artistic product, were OBLIGED to supply any image with the words: FACE OF YAR, MIM OF YAR AND MARY, TEMPLE OF MARY, YARA TEMPLE, YARA Rus ', etc.
Nowadays, when the persecution on religious charges has ceased, the icon painter no longer risks his life and property by making implicit inscriptions on modern icon paintings. Therefore, in a number of cases, namely in the cases of mosaic icons, he no longer tries to hide such inscriptions as much as possible, but transfers them to the category of semi-explicit ones.
Thus, the Russian material revealed the reason why explicit inscriptions on icons moved into the category of semi-explicit and implicit ones: the ban on Russian Vedism, which followed from the reforms of the Judeo-Christian Patriarch Nikon. However, this example gives grounds for speculating about the same motives for masking obvious inscriptions on coins.
In more detail, this idea can be expressed as follows: once the body of a deceased priest (mime) was accompanied by a golden funeral mask, on which there were all the relevant inscriptions, but made not very large and not very contrasting, so as not to destroy the aesthetic perception of the mask. Later, instead of a mask, smaller objects began to be used - pendants and plaques, which also depicted the face of a deceased mime with corresponding discreet inscriptions. Even later, portraits of mimes migrated to coins. And such images were preserved as long as the spiritual power was considered the most significant in society.
However, when power became secular, passing to military leaders - princes, leaders, kings, emperors, images of representatives of power, and not mimes, began to be minted on coins, while images of mimes migrated to icons. At the same time, the secular authorities, as more rude, began to mint their own inscriptions weightily, rudely, visibly, and obvious legends appeared on the coins. With the advent of Judeo-Christianity, such explicit inscriptions began to appear on icons, but they were no longer made with the runes of the Family, but with the Old Slavonic Cyrillic font. In the West, a Latin script was used for this.
Thus, in the West there was a similar, but still somewhat different motive, according to which the implicit inscriptions of mimes did not become explicit: on the one hand, the aesthetic tradition, on the other hand, the secularization of power, that is , the transfer of the function of governing society from priests to military leaders and officials.
This allows us to consider icons, as well as sacred sculptures of gods and saints, as substitutes for those artifacts that previously acted as carriers of sacred properties: golden masks and plaques. On the other hand, icons existed before, but did not affect the sphere of finance, remaining entirely within religion. Therefore, their production has experienced a new heyday.
Предлагаем посмотреть другие страницы сайта:
← Overlord - Planning and Exercise | Real Estate Agency in Minsk →
